lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2016]   [Jan]   [27]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
Patch in this message
/
From
Subject[PATCH 09/10] perf hists browser: Fix percent display in callchains
Date
When there's only a single callchain, perf doesn't print its percentage
in front of the symbols. This is because it assumes that the percentage
is same as parents. But if a percent limit is applied, it's possible
that there are actually a couple of child nodes but only one of them is
shown. In this case it should display the percent to prevent
misunderstanding of its percentage is same as the parent's.

For example, let's see the following callchain.

$ perf report --percent-limit 0.01 --tui
...
- 0.06% sleep [kernel.vmlinux] [k] kmem_cache_alloc_trace
kmem_cache_alloc_trace
- perf_event_mmap
- 0.04% mmap_region
do_mmap_pgoff
- vm_mmap_pgoff
+ 0.02% sys_mmap_pgoff
+ 0.02% vm_mmap
+ 0.02% mprotect_fixup

Current code omits the percent if 'mmap_region' becomes the only node
when percent limit is set to 0.03%, its percent is not 0.06% but users
will assume it incorrectly.

Before:

$ perf report --percent-limit 0.03 --tui
...
0.06% sleep [kernel.vmlinux] [k] kmem_cache_alloc_trace
kmem_cache_alloc_trace
- perf_event_mmap
- mmap_region
do_mmap_pgoff
vm_mmap_pgoff

After:

$ perf report --percent-limit 0.03 --stdio
...
0.06% sleep [kernel.vmlinux] [k] kmem_cache_alloc_trace
kmem_cache_alloc_trace
- perf_event_mmap
- 0.04% mmap_region
do_mmap_pgoff
vm_mmap_pgoff

Signed-off-by: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>
---
tools/perf/ui/browsers/hists.c | 24 +++++++++++++++++++-----
1 file changed, 19 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/tools/perf/ui/browsers/hists.c b/tools/perf/ui/browsers/hists.c
index 726c79def88d..4019221f6755 100644
--- a/tools/perf/ui/browsers/hists.c
+++ b/tools/perf/ui/browsers/hists.c
@@ -657,10 +657,24 @@ static int hist_browser__show_callchain_list(struct hist_browser *browser,
return 1;
}

+static bool check_percent_display(struct rb_node *node, u64 parent_total)
+{
+ struct callchain_node *child;
+
+ if (node == NULL)
+ return false;
+
+ if (rb_next(node))
+ return true;
+
+ child = rb_entry(node, struct callchain_node, rb_node);
+ return callchain_cumul_hits(child) != parent_total;
+}
+
static int hist_browser__show_callchain_flat(struct hist_browser *browser,
struct rb_root *root,
unsigned short row, u64 total,
- u64 parent_total __maybe_unused,
+ u64 parent_total,
print_callchain_entry_fn print,
struct callchain_print_arg *arg,
check_output_full_fn is_output_full)
@@ -670,7 +684,7 @@ static int hist_browser__show_callchain_flat(struct hist_browser *browser,
bool need_percent;

node = rb_first(root);
- need_percent = node && rb_next(node);
+ need_percent = check_percent_display(node, parent_total);

while (node) {
struct callchain_node *child = rb_entry(node, struct callchain_node, rb_node);
@@ -764,7 +778,7 @@ static char *hist_browser__folded_callchain_str(struct hist_browser *browser,
static int hist_browser__show_callchain_folded(struct hist_browser *browser,
struct rb_root *root,
unsigned short row, u64 total,
- u64 parent_total __maybe_unused,
+ u64 parent_total,
print_callchain_entry_fn print,
struct callchain_print_arg *arg,
check_output_full_fn is_output_full)
@@ -774,7 +788,7 @@ static int hist_browser__show_callchain_folded(struct hist_browser *browser,
bool need_percent;

node = rb_first(root);
- need_percent = node && rb_next(node);
+ need_percent = check_percent_display(node, parent_total);

while (node) {
struct callchain_node *child = rb_entry(node, struct callchain_node, rb_node);
@@ -863,7 +877,7 @@ static int hist_browser__show_callchain_graph(struct hist_browser *browser,
percent_total = parent_total;

node = rb_first(root);
- need_percent = node && rb_next(node);
+ need_percent = check_percent_display(node, parent_total);

while (node) {
struct callchain_node *child = rb_entry(node, struct callchain_node, rb_node);
--
2.6.4
\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2016-01-27 17:01    [W:0.256 / U:0.904 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site