lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2016]   [Jan]   [27]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
Patch in this message
/
From
Subject[PATCH] ARM: don't print missing L2 cache as error
Date
Not having a L2 cache controller is a shame, but not an error. Avoid
printing an error message if L2 controller initialization returns
with ENODEV.

Signed-off-by: Stefan Agner <stefan@agner.ch>
---
Hi Russel,

We use a multiplatform kernel for two similar SoC's, one with L2
cache the other without. Maybe silently ignore -ENODEV would be
an option too, not sure what is preferred here.

--
Stefan

arch/arm/kernel/irq.c | 4 +++-
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/arch/arm/kernel/irq.c b/arch/arm/kernel/irq.c
index 1d45320e..f80c480 100644
--- a/arch/arm/kernel/irq.c
+++ b/arch/arm/kernel/irq.c
@@ -95,7 +95,9 @@ void __init init_IRQ(void)
outer_cache.write_sec = machine_desc->l2c_write_sec;
ret = l2x0_of_init(machine_desc->l2c_aux_val,
machine_desc->l2c_aux_mask);
- if (ret)
+ if (ret == -ENODEV)
+ pr_info("L2C: no device found\n");
+ else if (ret)
pr_err("L2C: failed to init: %d\n", ret);
}

--
2.7.0
\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2016-01-28 02:41    [W:0.046 / U:0.192 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site