Messages in this thread | | | From | "Rafael J. Wysocki" <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH] power: APM_EMULATION does not depend on PM | Date | Wed, 27 Jan 2016 23:56:22 +0100 |
| |
On Monday, January 25, 2016 04:48:28 PM Arnd Bergmann wrote: > The APM emulation code does multiple things, and some of them depend on > PM_SLEEP, while the battery management does not. However, selecting > the symbol like SHARPSL_PM does causes a Kconfig warning: > > warning: (SHARPSL_PM && PMAC_APM_EMU) selects APM_EMULATION which has unmet direct dependencies (PM && SYS_SUPPORTS_APM_EMULATION) > > From all I can tell, this is completely harmless, and we can simply allow > APM_EMULATION to be enabled here, even if PM is not. > > Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Applied, thanks!
Rafael
| |