Messages in this thread | | | From | Robert Jarzmik <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH] pinctrl: pxa: guard sub-directory with CONFIG_PINCTRL_PXA | Date | Sat, 23 Jan 2016 23:22:02 +0100 |
| |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> writes:
> 2016-01-24 2:56 GMT+09:00 kbuild test robot <lkp@intel.com>: >> Hi Masahiro, >> >> [auto build test ERROR on next-20160122] >> [cannot apply to v4.4-rc8 v4.4-rc7 v4.4-rc6 v4.4] >> [if your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, please drop us a note to help improving the system] >> >> url: https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commits/Masahiro-Yamada/pinctrl-pxa-guard-sub-directory-with-CONFIG_PINCTRL_PXA/20160123-233501 >> config: x86_64-allmodconfig (attached as .config) >> reproduce: >> # save the attached .config to linux build tree >> make ARCH=x86_64 >> >> All errors (new ones prefixed by >>): >> >>>> ERROR: "pxa2xx_pinctrl_init" [drivers/pinctrl/pxa/pinctrl-pxa27x.ko] undefined! >> >> --- >> 0-DAY kernel test infrastructure Open Source Technology Center >> https://lists.01.org/pipermail/kbuild-all Intel Corporation > > > driver/pinctrl/pxa/ has never been compile-tested before, It was, and runtime tested also, in a builtin form. It was not activated in the kernel at the arch/arm pxa architecture level would be a better statement.
> [2] this driver is declared as tristate, but it cannot be a module, > so I posted this: > https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/8097781/ Yes this certainly is a bug.
> I hope [2] will be applied before this patch > in order to suppress the complaint by the kbuild test robot. Let's see what Linus thinks of it.
Cheers.
-- Robert
| |