lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2016]   [Jan]   [19]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
SubjectRe: [PATCH 0/2] cpuidle optimizations (on top of linux-next)
From
On Tue, Jan 19, 2016 at 8:28 AM, Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> wrote:
>
> * Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com> wrote:
>
>> On 15/01/16 23:53, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
>> >Hi,
>> >
>> >When I was looking at the cpuidle code after the Sudeeps's problem report,
>> >it occured to me that we had some pointless overhead there, so two
>> >changes to reduce it follow.
>> >
>> >[1/2] Make the fallback to to default_idle_call() in call_cpuidle()
>> > unnecessary and drop it.
>> >[2/2] Make menu_select() avoid checking states that don't need to
>> > (or even shouldn't) be checked when making the selection.
>> >
>>
>> Tested-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
>
> Rafael, can I pick these up into the scheduler tree?

They won't apply at this point as one commit they depend on is in my
linux-next branch waiting for the next push.

Would it be a problem if they went in through the PM tree instead?

Thanks,
Rafael

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2016-01-19 14:21    [W:2.157 / U:0.028 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site