Messages in this thread | | | Subject | Re: Build regressions/improvements in v4.4 | From | Michael Ellerman <> | Date | Tue, 19 Jan 2016 10:34:10 +1100 |
| |
On Mon, 2016-01-18 at 08:32 -0800, Guenter Roeck wrote: > On 01/13/2016 09:44 PM, Michael Ellerman wrote: > > On Mon, 2016-01-11 at 12:38 +0100, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > > > Hi Günter, > > > On Mon, Jan 11, 2016 at 12:14 PM, Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net> wrote: > > > > On Mon, Jan 11, 2016 at 09:29:52AM +0100, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > > > > > On Mon, Jan 11, 2016 at 9:28 AM, Geert Uytterhoeven > > > > > <geert@linux-m68k.org> wrote: > > > > > > JFYI, when comparing v4.4[1] to v4.4-rc8[3], the summaries are: > > > > > > - build errors: +13/-13 > > > > > > [1] http://kisskb.ellerman.id.au/kisskb/head/9774/ (all 259 configs) > > > > > > > > > > + /tmp/ccnzCwY6.s: Error: can't resolve `_start' {*UND* section} - > > > > > `L0^A' {.text section}: => 43 > > > > > + /tmp/ccyAN6Ix.s: Error: can't resolve `_start' {*UND* section} - > > > > > `L0^A' {.text section}: => 43 > > > > > > > > > > Various MIPS, the saga continues... > > > > > > > > Hi Geert, > > > > > > > > do you know which version of binutils is used by kisskb ? > > > > If it is 2.23.90 or similar (ie below 2.24 and third level version > > > > has more than one digit), there is a patch pending to fix it. > > > > > > No, I don't know. > > > > It dumps the GCC version, but not binutils. I should add that one day. > > > > The mips toolchain is pretty old, so it's using binutils 2.22. Are you saying I > > need to update it? > > > Michael, > > is your toolchain available somewhere as binary ? I'd like to add a single > mips build test using it if possible.
Hi Guenter,
I'm still using this old one from kernel.org:
https://www.kernel.org/pub/tools/crosstool/files/bin/x86_64/4.6.3/x86_64-gcc-4.6.3-nolibc_mips-linux.tar.bz2
cheers
| |