lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2015]   [Sep]   [7]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: [PATCH v6 1/2] perf,kvm/powerpc: Add kvm_perf.h for powerpc
From
Date
On Fri, 2015-09-04 at 17:51 -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> Em Tue, Sep 01, 2015 at 12:18:47PM +0530, Hemant Kumar escreveu:
> > >Should I try to process the 5 together, applying thest two first?
>
> > Yes, this patchset needs to be applied before applying the other patchset,
> > since there is a direct dependency on these two for the tooling part to
> > work.
>
> > >I see there are no acks from powerpc arch maintainers, how should we
> > >proceed here? If there are no problems with the arch bits, and if it is
> > >just to enable the tooling part, again, should I process the 5 as just
> > >one series?
>
> > The reason to split the earlier patchset into two was to separate the
> > tooling/perf/ and arch/powerpc/ side patches, as asked by Michael..
>
> > Here is the link to that discussion :
> > http://www.mail-archive.com/linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org/msg86916.html
>
> > If Michael is ok with the patches, you can process all the 5 patches
> > together. Michael?
>
> Michael?

I'm not particularly happy with it.

Can we at least remove this hunk from the uapi header:

+/* This is to shut the compiler up */
+#define KVM_ENTRY_TRACE ""
+#define KVM_EXIT_TRACE ""
+#define KVM_EXIT_REASON ""


cheers




\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2015-09-07 07:41    [W:0.056 / U:0.788 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site