Messages in this thread | | | Date | Fri, 4 Sep 2015 13:42:51 -0300 | From | Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH 12/15] tools lib api: Add configured support for fs |
| |
Em Fri, Sep 04, 2015 at 09:08:45AM +0200, Jiri Olsa escreveu: > On Wed, Sep 02, 2015 at 01:52:28PM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote: > > Em Wed, Sep 02, 2015 at 11:17:59AM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo escreveu: > > > Em Wed, Sep 02, 2015 at 03:46:25PM +0200, Jiri Olsa escreveu: > > > > On Wed, Sep 02, 2015 at 10:39:31AM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote: > > > > > Em Wed, Sep 02, 2015 at 09:56:42AM +0200, Jiri Olsa escreveu: > > > > > > Adding name__mount (where name is in sysfs,procfs,debugfs,tracefs) > > > > > > The cut'n'paste error I mentioned was in the above line, BTW. > > > > > > > > > interface that returns bool state of the filesystem mount: > > > > > > true - mounted, false - not mounted > > > > > > > > > > Well, why not take the opportunity and call it... name__mounted()? > > > > > "__configured()" is too vague... > > > > > > > > I mirrored the debugfs/tracefs object interface > > > > we can have another patch changing that > > > > > > Ok, agreed, will leave it as configured() and then we can change it. > > > > What I have is at my tmp.perf/core branch, out for lunch. > > I can see all of it in your's perf/core apart from: > > Applying: tools lib api: Make tracing_path_strerror_open message generic > Applying: tools lib api: Replace debugfs/tracefs objects interface with fs.c > Applying: tools lib api: Remove debugfs, tracefs and findfs objects > Applying: perf tools: Switch to tracing_path interface on appropriate places > > should I repost or do you plan to take it? I didn't get any comments on those
I'll get back to those, its just that the number of patches in my perf/core branch was getting too high, better flush it a bit, will continue.
If you can just make sure that a rebase on top of my perf/core goes well, that helps.
- Arnaldo
| |