Messages in this thread | | | Date | Wed, 30 Sep 2015 10:18:23 +0200 | Subject | Re: [PATCH 0/3] allow zram to use zbud as underlying allocator | From | Vitaly Wool <> |
| |
On Wed, Sep 30, 2015 at 10:13 AM, Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org> wrote: > On Wed, Sep 30, 2015 at 10:01:59AM +0200, Vitaly Wool wrote: >> > Could you share your script? >> > I will ask our production team to reproduce it. >> >> Wait, let me get it right. Your production team? >> I take it as you would like me to help your company fix your bugs. >> You are pushing the limits here. > > I'm really sorry if you take it as fixing my bugs. > I never wanted it but just want to help your problem. > Please read LKML. Normally, developers wanted to share test script to > reproduce the problem because it's easier to solve the problem > without consuming much time with ping-pong.
Normally developers do not have backing up "production teams".
> Anyway, I have shared my experience to you and suggest patches and > on-going works. In your concept, I shouldn't do that for fixing > your problems so I shouldn't help you any more? Right?
I never asked you to fix my problems. I have substantial proof that zsmalloc is fragile enough not to be a good fit for projects I work on and I want to have the code that allows zram to work with zbud mainlined. Whatever you want me to do to help you fix zsmalloc issues *should* be *orthogonal* to the former. You are abusing your maintainer role here, trying to act in favor of your company rather than for the benefit of OSS.
| |