Messages in this thread | | | From | "Huang\, Ying" <> | Subject | Re: [lkp] [nfsd] 4aac1bf05b: -2.9% fsmark.files_per_sec | Date | Wed, 30 Sep 2015 07:27:54 +0800 |
| |
Jeff Layton <jeff.layton@primarydata.com> writes:
> On Mon, 28 Sep 2015 14:49:32 +0800 > kernel test robot <ying.huang@intel.com> wrote: > >> FYI, we noticed the below changes on >> >> ========================================================================================= >> tbox_group/testcase/rootfs/kconfig/compiler/cpufreq_governor/iterations/nr_threads/disk/fs/fs2/filesize/test_size/sync_method/nr_directories/nr_files_per_directory: >> lkp-ne04/fsmark/debian-x86_64-2015-02-07.cgz/x86_64-rhel/gcc-4.9/performance/1x/32t/1HDD/xfs/nfsv4/5K/400M/fsyncBeforeClose/16d/256fpd >> >> commit: >> cd2d35ff27c4fda9ba73b0aa84313e8e20ce4d2c >> 4aac1bf05b053a201a4b392dd9a684fb2b7e6103 >> > > A question... > > I think my tree should now contain a fix for this, but with a > performance regression like this it's difficult to know for sure. > > Is there some (automated) way to request that the KTR redo this test? > If not, will I get a note saying "problem seems to now be fixed" or do > I just take a lack of further emails from the KTR about this as a sign > that it's resolved?
Can you provide the branch name and commit ID for your tree with fix? I can confirm whether it is fixed for you.
Best Regards, Huang, Ying
| |