lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2015]   [Sep]   [29]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
SubjectRe: [lkp] [nfsd] 4aac1bf05b: -2.9% fsmark.files_per_sec
Date
Jeff Layton <jeff.layton@primarydata.com> writes:

> On Mon, 28 Sep 2015 14:49:32 +0800
> kernel test robot <ying.huang@intel.com> wrote:
>
>> FYI, we noticed the below changes on
>>
>> =========================================================================================
>> tbox_group/testcase/rootfs/kconfig/compiler/cpufreq_governor/iterations/nr_threads/disk/fs/fs2/filesize/test_size/sync_method/nr_directories/nr_files_per_directory:
>> lkp-ne04/fsmark/debian-x86_64-2015-02-07.cgz/x86_64-rhel/gcc-4.9/performance/1x/32t/1HDD/xfs/nfsv4/5K/400M/fsyncBeforeClose/16d/256fpd
>>
>> commit:
>> cd2d35ff27c4fda9ba73b0aa84313e8e20ce4d2c
>> 4aac1bf05b053a201a4b392dd9a684fb2b7e6103
>>
>
> A question...
>
> I think my tree should now contain a fix for this, but with a
> performance regression like this it's difficult to know for sure.
>
> Is there some (automated) way to request that the KTR redo this test?
> If not, will I get a note saying "problem seems to now be fixed" or do
> I just take a lack of further emails from the KTR about this as a sign
> that it's resolved?

Can you provide the branch name and commit ID for your tree with fix? I
can confirm whether it is fixed for you.

Best Regards,
Huang, Ying


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2015-09-30 01:41    [W:0.089 / U:0.252 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site