Messages in this thread | | | Subject | Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH RFC] xen: if on Xen, "flatten" the scheduling domain hierarchy | From | George Dunlap <> | Date | Tue, 22 Sep 2015 17:22:40 +0100 |
| |
On 09/22/2015 05:42 AM, Juergen Gross wrote: > One other thing I just discovered: there are other consumers of the > topology sibling masks (e.g. topology_sibling_cpumask()) as well. > > I think we would want to avoid any optimizations based on those in > drivers as well, not only in the scheduler.
I'm beginning to lose the thread of the discussion here a bit.
Juergen / Dario, could one of you summarize your two approaches, and the (alleged) advantages and disadvantages of each one?
Thanks, -George
| |