Messages in this thread | | | Date | Tue, 22 Sep 2015 23:12:18 +0100 | From | Lee Jones <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH v3 04/12] backlight: pwm_bl: remove useless call to pwm_set_period |
| |
On Mon, 21 Sep 2015, Boris Brezillon wrote:
> The PWM period will be set when calling pwm_config. Remove this useless > call to pwm_set_period, which might mess up with the initial PWM state > once we have added proper support for PWM init state retrieval. > > Signed-off-by: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@free-electrons.com> > --- > drivers/video/backlight/pwm_bl.c | 8 +++++--- > 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
Acked-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>
> diff --git a/drivers/video/backlight/pwm_bl.c b/drivers/video/backlight/pwm_bl.c > index ae498c1..71944f8 100644 > --- a/drivers/video/backlight/pwm_bl.c > +++ b/drivers/video/backlight/pwm_bl.c > @@ -293,12 +293,14 @@ static int pwm_backlight_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) > * period, parsed from the DT, in the PWM device. For the non-DT case, > * set the period from platform data if it has not already been set > * via the PWM lookup table. > + * FIXME: This assignment should be dropped as soon as all the boards > + * have moved to the PWM lookup table approach. The same goes for the > + * pb->period field which should be replaced by > + * pwm_get_default_period() calls. > */ > pb->period = pwm_get_default_period(pb->pwm); > - if (!pb->period && (data->pwm_period_ns > 0)) { > + if (!pb->period && (data->pwm_period_ns > 0)) > pb->period = data->pwm_period_ns; > - pwm_set_period(pb->pwm, data->pwm_period_ns); > - } > > pb->lth_brightness = data->lth_brightness * (pb->period / pb->scale); >
-- Lee Jones Linaro STMicroelectronics Landing Team Lead Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog
| |