[lkml]   [2015]   [Sep]   [2]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: Problems loading firmware using built-in drivers with kernels that use initramfs.
On Wed, Sep 2, 2015 at 4:29 PM, Dmitry Torokhov
<> wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 2, 2015 at 4:22 PM, Luis R. Rodriguez <> wrote:
>> On Wed, Sep 02, 2015 at 04:13:51PM -0700, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
>>> On Wed, Sep 2, 2015 at 2:03 PM, Arend van Spriel <> wrote:
>>> > Ok. So some background why we need it in brcm80211 drivers. So as a wireless
>>> > network device driver the answer we got when asking for an event to load
>>> > firware is upon IF_UP for a registered net device. Because we try to do
>>> > things smart we query the firmware running on the device for capabilities
>>> > before we can register the net device hence we request the firmware during
>>> > probe. This may be specific to wireless drivers (Intel has same approach if
>>> > not mistaken) but I suspect there may be more.
>>> We have the same issue with input devices: before we can register one
>>> we need to set their capabilities and to know their capabilities we
>>> quite often need to load their firmware/config and query the device.
>> Should Arend's driver use async probe then?
> What has async probe have to do with anything? We will still be
> waiting for async probes to finish before we mount rootfs so it will
> not change absolutely anything.

:) Right, its what I was alluding to as well.

>> IMHO its just as hacky as using -EPROBE_DEFER too, but its at least
>> preemptively hacky. Sadly I can't think of clear and clever way for the kernel
>> to know when firmware will be ready either... Would userspace know? Should the
>> kernel learn this from userspace ?
> Yes. Given only userspace knows when firmware is available (I could
> have it on a separate device and mount it at some time). So maybe
> userpsace should simply try and scan busses for unbound devices and
> tell them to re-probe when it decides that firmware is finally
> available.

OK, the folks wanting this mechanism can implement it then. Short of
that we only have hacks.


 \ /
  Last update: 2015-09-03 02:01    [W:0.073 / U:0.084 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site