lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2015]   [Sep]   [1]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
Date
SubjectRe: [PATCH v2 2/4] remoteproc: dt: Provide bindings for ST's Remote Processor Controller driver
On Tue, Sep 1, 2015 at 5:41 AM, Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org> wrote:
> On Mon, 31 Aug 2015, Rob Herring wrote:
>
>> On Fri, Aug 28, 2015 at 5:31 AM, Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org> wrote:
>> > Signed-off-by: Ludovic Barre <ludovic.barre@st.com>
>> > Signed-off-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>
>> > ---
>> > .../devicetree/bindings/remoteproc/st-rproc.txt | 35 ++++++++++++++++++++++
>> > 1 file changed, 35 insertions(+)
>> > create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/remoteproc/st-rproc.txt
>> >
>> > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/remoteproc/st-rproc.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/remoteproc/st-rproc.txt
>> > new file mode 100644
>> > index 0000000..fbd7d78
>> > --- /dev/null
>> > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/remoteproc/st-rproc.txt
>> > @@ -0,0 +1,35 @@
>> > +STMicroelectronics Remote Processor
>>
>> "remote processor" is what STM datasheets call them? This seems like
>> Linux naming is leaking in here.
>
> That's what this directory is called and the other binding within it.

That doesn't make it right or answer my question. Certainly our
directory structure too closely mirrors the kernel.

Rob


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2015-09-01 14:01    [W:0.071 / U:0.108 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site