lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2015]   [Aug]   [4]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH 4/8] watchdog: Make set_timeout function optional
Hi Uwe,

On 08/04/2015 08:38 AM, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On Mon, Aug 03, 2015 at 07:13:30PM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
>> For some watchdogs, the hardware timeout is fixed, and the
>> watchdog driver depends on the watchdog core to handle the
>> actual timeout. In this situation, the watchdog driver might
>> only set the 'timeout' variable but do nothing else.
>> This can as well be handled by the infrastructure, so make
>> the set_timeout callback optional. If WDIOF_SETTIMEOUT is
>> configured but the .set_timeout callback is not available,
>> update the timeout variable in the infrastructure code.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
>> ---
>> Documentation/watchdog/watchdog-kernel-api.txt | 4 ++++
>> drivers/watchdog/watchdog_dev.c | 9 ++++++---
>> 2 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/Documentation/watchdog/watchdog-kernel-api.txt b/Documentation/watchdog/watchdog-kernel-api.txt
>> index 7fda3c86cf46..2f1a4ad7e565 100644
>> --- a/Documentation/watchdog/watchdog-kernel-api.txt
>> +++ b/Documentation/watchdog/watchdog-kernel-api.txt
>> @@ -178,6 +178,10 @@ they are supported. These optional routines/operations are:
>> because the watchdog does not necessarily has a 1 second resolution).
>> (Note: the WDIOF_SETTIMEOUT needs to be set in the options field of the
>> watchdog's info structure).
>> + If the watchdog driver does not have to perform any action but setting the
>> + timeout value of the watchdog_device, this callback can be omitted.
>> + If set_timeout is not provided but WDIOF_SETTIMEOUT is set, the watchdog
>> + infrastructure updates the timeout value of the watchdog_device internally.
> What is the semantic of struct watchdog_device.timeout? Is it the
> corrently configured hw-timeout? Or what userspace sees? In the former
> case timeout shouldn't be updated. And in the latter case it's wrong
> that the worker thread uses this member to determine the needed rate for
> it's auto pinging.
>

.timeout is what user-space sees, but it is also what may be configured
into the hardware, depending on the value of max_hw_timeout and on the driver.

For example, if timeout = 5s and max_hw_timeout = 6000ms, the driver would (or might)
configure the _current_ hardware timeout to 5s. The worker would not be activated.
If, on the other side, timeout = 10s and max_hw_timeout = 6000ms, the driver would
configure the hardware timeout to 6s, the worker would send a heartbeat every
3 seconds, and user space would be expected to send a heartbeat every 5 seconds
or so (assuming it uses timeout/2 to determine when to send heartbeats).

Thanks,
Guenter



\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2015-08-04 19:01    [W:0.123 / U:0.364 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site