lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2015]   [Jul]   [9]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
Patch in this message
/
From
Subject[PATCH 3/5] kmod: Add up-to-date explanations on the purpose of each asynchronous levels
Date
There seem to be quite some confusions on the comments, likely due to
changes that came after them.

Now since it's very non obvious why we have 3 levels of asynchronous
code to implement usermodehelpers, it's important to comment in detail
the reason of this layout.

Cc: Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>
Cc: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Christoph Lameter <cl@linux.com>
Signed-off-by: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>
---
kernel/kmod.c | 25 +++++++++++++++++--------
1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/kmod.c b/kernel/kmod.c
index d8cc116ab..9ffb24c 100644
--- a/kernel/kmod.c
+++ b/kernel/kmod.c
@@ -221,12 +221,12 @@ static int call_usermodehelper_exec_async(void *data)
flush_signal_handlers(current, 1);
spin_unlock_irq(&current->sighand->siglock);

- /* We can run anywhere, unlike our parent keventd(). */
+ /* We can run anywhere, unlike our parent (unbound workqueue). */
set_cpus_allowed_ptr(current, cpu_all_mask);

/*
- * Our parent is keventd, which runs with elevated scheduling priority.
- * Avoid propagating that into the userspace child.
+ * Our parent is the unbound workqueue, which runs with elevated
+ * scheduling priority. Avoid propagating that into the userspace child.
*/
set_user_nice(current, 0);

@@ -267,7 +267,7 @@ out:
do_exit(0);
}

-/* Keventd can't block, but this (a child) can. */
+/* Handles UMH_WAIT_PROC. */
static int call_usermodehelper_exec_sync(void *data)
{
struct subprocess_info *sub_info = data;
@@ -283,8 +283,8 @@ static int call_usermodehelper_exec_sync(void *data)
/*
* Normally it is bogus to call wait4() from in-kernel because
* wait4() wants to write the exit code to a userspace address.
- * But call_usermodehelper_exec_sync() always runs as keventd,
- * and put_user() to a kernel address works OK for kernel
+ * But call_usermodehelper_exec_sync() always runs as kernel
+ * thread and put_user() to a kernel address works OK for kernel
* threads, due to their having an mm_segment_t which spans the
* entire address space.
*
@@ -305,7 +305,16 @@ static int call_usermodehelper_exec_sync(void *data)
do_exit(0);
}

-/* This is run by khelper thread */
+/*
+ * This function doesn't strictly need to be called asynchronously. But we
+ * need to create the usermodehelper kernel threads from a task that is affine
+ * to all CPUs (or nohz housekeeping ones) such that they inherit a widest
+ * affinity irrespective of call_usermodehelper() callers with possibly reduced
+ * affinity (eg: per-cpu workqueues). We don't want usermodehelper targets to
+ * contend any busy CPU.
+ *
+ * Unbound workqueues provide such wide affinity.
+ */
static void call_usermodehelper_exec_work(struct work_struct *work)
{
struct subprocess_info *sub_info =
@@ -533,7 +542,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(call_usermodehelper_setup);
* from interrupt context.
*
* Runs a user-space application. The application is started
- * asynchronously if wait is not set, and runs as a child of keventd.
+ * asynchronously if wait is not set, and runs as a child of unbound workqueues.
* (ie. it runs with full root capabilities).
*/
int call_usermodehelper_exec(struct subprocess_info *sub_info, int wait)
--
2.1.4


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2015-07-09 20:21    [W:0.119 / U:1.212 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site