lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2015]   [Jul]   [5]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
Patch in this message
/
Date
From
Subject[patch 3/4] x86/irq: Use proper locking in check_irq_vectors_for_cpu_disable()
It's unsafe to examine fields in the irq descriptor w/o holding the
descriptor lock. Add proper locking.

While at it add a comment why the vector check can run lock less

Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
---
arch/x86/kernel/irq.c | 13 ++++++++++++-
1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

Index: tip/arch/x86/kernel/irq.c
===================================================================
--- tip.orig/arch/x86/kernel/irq.c
+++ tip/arch/x86/kernel/irq.c
@@ -347,14 +347,22 @@ int check_irq_vectors_for_cpu_disable(vo
if (!desc)
continue;

+ /*
+ * Protect against concurrent action removal,
+ * affinity changes etc.
+ */
+ raw_spin_lock(&desc->lock);
data = irq_desc_get_irq_data(desc);
cpumask_copy(&affinity_new, data->affinity);
cpumask_clear_cpu(this_cpu, &affinity_new);

/* Do not count inactive or per-cpu irqs. */
- if (!irq_has_action(irq) || irqd_is_per_cpu(data))
+ if (!irq_has_action(irq) || irqd_is_per_cpu(data)) {
+ raw_spin_unlock(&desc->lock);
continue;
+ }

+ raw_spin_unlock(&desc->lock);
/*
* A single irq may be mapped to multiple
* cpu's vector_irq[] (for example IOAPIC cluster
@@ -385,6 +393,9 @@ int check_irq_vectors_for_cpu_disable(vo
* vector. If the vector is marked in the used vectors
* bitmap or an irq is assigned to it, we don't count
* it as available.
+ *
+ * As this is an inaccurate snapshot anyway, we can do
+ * this w/o holding vector_lock.
*/
for (vector = FIRST_EXTERNAL_VECTOR;
vector < first_system_vector; vector++) {



\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2015-07-05 19:41    [W:0.101 / U:1.104 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site