Messages in this thread | | | Date | Tue, 14 Jul 2015 12:01:49 -0400 | From | Josef Bacik <> | Subject | Re: [patch] sched: beef up wake_wide() |
| |
On 07/14/2015 11:39 AM, Mike Galbraith wrote: > On Tue, 2015-07-14 at 17:04 +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote: >> On Tue, Jul 14, 2015 at 04:17:46PM +0200, Mike Galbraith wrote: >>> There's a buglet, >> >>> We'll not look for a idle cpu when wake_wide() naks want_affine. >> >> *sigh* indeed.. fixing that'll bring us very close to what we started >> out wiht.. >> >> The one XXX there raises the question on whether we should always so >> select_idle_sibling() if we do not have a suitable balance flag, or only >> on wakeups. > > That's what I've been sitting here waffling over, finally convinced > myself that should the user turn FORX/EXEC off, he shouldn't find that a > substitute quietly slipped in.. though otoh.. crap, guess I'm not done > waffling after all. Yeah, this will work just fine ;-) > > (typos fixed) >
We happy with this or should I wait for more patches to fly by before I test something ;)?
Josef
| |