lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2015]   [Jul]   [10]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: [PATCH 02/11] soc/fsl: Introduce DPAA BMan device management driver
From
Date
On Fri, 2015-07-10 at 10:38 +0200, Paul Bolle wrote:
> On do, 2015-07-09 at 16:21 -0400, Roy Pledge wrote:
> > --- /dev/null
> > +++ b/drivers/soc/fsl/qbman/Kconfig
> > @@ -0,0 +1,33 @@
> > +menuconfig FSL_DPA
> > + bool "Freescale DPAA support"
> > + depends on FSL_SOC || COMPILE_TEST
>
> Are you sure about COMPILE_TEST?
>
> > + default n
> > + help
> > + FSL Data-Path Acceleration Architecture drivers
> > +
> > + These are not the actual Ethernet driver(s)
> > +
> > +if FSL_DPA
>
> [...]
>
> > +config FSL_BMAN
> > + tristate "BMan device management"
> > + default n
> > + help
> > + FSL DPAA BMan driver
> > +
> > +endif # FSL_DPA
>
> Because with FSL_BMAN set to 'm' testing things with
> make -C ../../../.. M=$PWD bman.ko
>
> will not actually compile on x86_64:
>
> make: Entering directory '[...]'
> CC [M] [...]/drivers/soc/fsl/qbman/bman.o
> In file included from [...]/drivers/soc/fsl/qbman/bman_priv.h:33:0,
> from [...]/drivers/soc/fsl/qbman/bman.c:31:
> [...]/drivers/soc/fsl/qbman/dpaa_sys.h: In function ‘mfatb’:
> [...]/drivers/soc/fsl/qbman/dpaa_sys.h:134:8: error: implicit declaration
> of function ‘mfspr’ [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
> hi = mfspr(SPRN_ATBU);
> ^
> [...]/drivers/soc/fsl/qbman/dpaa_sys.h:134:14: error: ‘SPRN_ATBU’
> undeclared (first use in this function)
> hi = mfspr(SPRN_ATBU);
> ^
> [...]/drivers/soc/fsl/qbman/dpaa_sys.h:134:14: note: each undeclared
> identifier is reported only once for each function it appears in
> [...]/drivers/soc/fsl/qbman/dpaa_sys.h:135:14: error: ‘SPRN_ATBL’
> undeclared (first use in this function)
> lo = mfspr(SPRN_ATBL);
> ^
> [...]/drivers/soc/fsl/qbman/bman.c: In function ‘__bm_in’:
> [...]/drivers/soc/fsl/qbman/bman.c:168:9: error: implicit declaration of
> function ‘in_be32’ [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
> return in_be32((void *)bm + offset);
> ^
> [...]/drivers/soc/fsl/qbman/bman.c: In function ‘__bm_out’:
> [...]/drivers/soc/fsl/qbman/bman.c:172:2: error: implicit declaration of
> function ‘out_be32’ [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
> out_be32((void *)bm + offset, val);

These PPCisms will need to be fixed. LS1043A is an ARM chip with DPAA 1.0.

> ^
> [...]/drivers/soc/fsl/qbman/bman.c: In function ‘of_fsl_bman_probe’:
> [...]/drivers/soc/fsl/qbman/bman.c:463:17: error: ‘NO_IRQ’ undeclared
> (first use in this function)
> if (err_irq == NO_IRQ) {

This isn't even a PPCism. It's just wrong. Compare to zero instead.

-Scott



\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2015-07-10 20:01    [W:0.541 / U:0.240 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site