Messages in this thread | | | Date | Thu, 4 Jun 2015 15:25:48 +0100 | From | Javi Merino <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH v5 3/3] tools lib traceevent: Add support for __print_array() |
| |
Hi Steve,
On Fri, Feb 27, 2015 at 02:15:05PM +0000, Steven Rostedt wrote: > On Fri, 27 Feb 2015 12:32:32 +0000 > Javi Merino <javi.merino@arm.com> wrote: > > On Wed, Jan 28, 2015 at 12:48:55PM +0000, Javi Merino wrote: > > > Trace can now generate traces with variable element size arrays. Add > > > support to parse them. > > > > > > Cc: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org> > > > Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com> > > > Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> > > > Cc: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com> > > > Signed-off-by: Javi Merino <javi.merino@arm.com> > > > --- > > > tools/lib/traceevent/event-parse.c | 93 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > > > tools/lib/traceevent/event-parse.h | 8 ++++ > > > 2 files changed, 101 insertions(+) > > > > I've seen that patch 1 of this series is now in mainline. What about > > patches 2 and 3 (the updates to tools/lib/traceevent)? Shall I resend > > them? > > Patches 2 and 3 are in tools/lib and need to go through Jiri and > Arnaldo. Please repost them again. I can give them acks. > > > > > These two patches should also be applied to trace-cmd. Do you want me > > to send patches for that to linux-kernel or will you take care of > > applying them there? > > No need, I can pull them from here. I just been a bit busy to do so.
These two patches (b839e1e846ed ("tools lib traceevent: Add support for __print_array()") and 929a6bb71aa5 ("tools lib traceevent: Factor out allocating and processing args")) went in as of 4.1-rc1. Any estimate of when can we have a trace-cmd that have them?
Thanks, Javi
| |