Messages in this thread | | | Date | Thu, 25 Jun 2015 11:18:13 +0200 | Subject | Re: [PATCH v2 7/9] ARM: multi_v7_defconfig: Enable support for PWM Regulators | From | Javier Martinez Canillas <> |
| |
Hello Lee,
On Thu, Jun 25, 2015 at 10:42 AM, Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org> wrote: > On Wed, 24 Jun 2015, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote:
[...]
>> > diff --git a/arch/arm/configs/multi_v7_defconfig b/arch/arm/configs/multi_v7_defconfig >> > index f632af0..6666973 100644 >> > --- a/arch/arm/configs/multi_v7_defconfig >> > +++ b/arch/arm/configs/multi_v7_defconfig >> > @@ -365,6 +365,7 @@ CONFIG_REGULATOR_MAX8907=y >> > CONFIG_REGULATOR_MAX8973=y >> > CONFIG_REGULATOR_MAX77686=y >> > CONFIG_REGULATOR_PALMAS=y >> > +CONFIG_REGULATOR_PWM=y >> >> The current policy is to build as much as possible as a module in >> multi_v7_defconfig. Since this is a tristate Kconfig symbol, could you >> please change it to =m ? > > I would prefer that it stays built-in. >
Ok, I've no strong opinion on this. I was just mentioning what arm-soc maintainers prefer nowadays.
May I ask what's the rationale for leaving this option built-in?
Best regards, Javier
| |