lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2015]   [Jun]   [16]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
Patch in this message
/
From
Subject[PATCH 3.4 083/172] ARM: at91: pm: fix at91rm9200 standby
Date
From: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@free-electrons.com>

3.4.108-rc1 review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------


commit 84e871660bebfddb9a62ebd6f19d02536e782f0a upstream.

at91rm9200 standby and suspend to ram has been broken since
00482a4078f4. It is wrongly using AT91_BASE_SYS which is a physical address
and actually doesn't correspond to any register on at91rm9200.

Use the correct at91_ramc_base[0] instead.

Fixes: 00482a4078f4 (ARM: at91: implement the standby function for pm/cpuidle)

Signed-off-by: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@free-electrons.com>
Signed-off-by: Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@atmel.com>
Signed-off-by: Zefan Li <lizefan@huawei.com>
---
arch/arm/mach-at91/pm.h | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-at91/pm.h b/arch/arm/mach-at91/pm.h
index 89f56f3..8c3f8e8 100644
--- a/arch/arm/mach-at91/pm.h
+++ b/arch/arm/mach-at91/pm.h
@@ -38,7 +38,7 @@ static inline void at91rm9200_standby(void)
" mcr p15, 0, %0, c7, c0, 4\n\t"
" str %5, [%1, %2]"
:
- : "r" (0), "r" (AT91_BASE_SYS), "r" (AT91RM9200_SDRAMC_LPR),
+ : "r" (0), "r" (at91_ramc_base[0]), "r" (AT91RM9200_SDRAMC_LPR),
"r" (1), "r" (AT91RM9200_SDRAMC_SRR),
"r" (lpr));
}
--
1.9.1


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2015-06-16 11:41    [W:0.747 / U:0.168 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site