lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2015]   [May]   [28]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH RESEND] sched: prefer an idle cpu vs an idle sibling for BALANCE_WAKE

* Mike Galbraith <mgalbraith@novell.com> wrote:

> On Thu, 2015-05-28 at 12:21 +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
>
> > In fact, select_idle_sibling() is already too expensive on current
> > server hardware (far too damn many cpus in a LLC domain).
>
> Yup. I've played with rate limiting motion per task because of that.
> Packages have gotten way too damn big.

What's the biggest you've seen?

Thanks,

Ingo


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2015-05-28 14:21    [W:0.114 / U:0.104 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site