lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2015]   [May]   [25]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH] clockevents: don't suspend/resume if unused
Thomas, Daniel,

Any opinion on that?
Maybe this patch could go in as is?


On 16/01/2015 at 17:59:14 +0100, Alexandre Belloni wrote :
> Hi,
>
> On 16/01/2015 at 10:20:14 +0100, Sylvain Rochet wrote :
> > > + if (dev->suspend && dev->mode != CLOCK_EVT_MODE_UNUSED)
> >
> > I wonder if we should use > CLOCK_EVT_MODE_SHUTDOWN
> > (or CLOCK_EVT_MODE_UNUSED || CLOCK_EVT_MODE_SHUTDOWN) instead of
> > !CLOCK_EVT_MODE_UNUSED.
> >
>
> I'll let Thomas or Daniel decide :) But I'm open to that.
>
> >--
> Alexandre Belloni, Free Electrons
> Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android engineering
> http://free-electrons.com

--
Alexandre Belloni, Free Electrons
Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android engineering
http://free-electrons.com

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2015-05-25 18:41    [W:0.060 / U:0.988 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site