Messages in this thread | | | Date | Fri, 17 Apr 2015 15:19:52 +0800 | From | Xie XiuQi <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH] ACPI / scan: Annotate physical_node_lock in acpi_scan_is_offline() |
| |
On 2015/4/11 7:31, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > From: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> > > acpi_scan_is_offline() may be called under the physical_node_lock > of the given device object's parent, so prevent lockdep from > complaining about that by annotating that instance with > SINGLE_DEPTH_NESTING. > > Reported-by: Xie XiuQi <xiexiuqi@huawei.com> > Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Tested-by: Xie XiuQi <xiexiuqi@huawei.com>
Thanks, Xie XiuQi
> --- > drivers/acpi/scan.c | 6 +++++- > 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > Index: linux-pm/drivers/acpi/scan.c > =================================================================== > --- linux-pm.orig/drivers/acpi/scan.c > +++ linux-pm/drivers/acpi/scan.c > @@ -298,7 +298,11 @@ bool acpi_scan_is_offline(struct acpi_de > struct acpi_device_physical_node *pn; > bool offline = true; > > - mutex_lock(&adev->physical_node_lock); > + /* > + * acpi_container_offline() calls this for all of the container's > + * children under the container's physical_node_lock lock. > + */ > + mutex_lock_nested(&adev->physical_node_lock, SINGLE_DEPTH_NESTING); > > list_for_each_entry(pn, &adev->physical_node_list, node) > if (device_supports_offline(pn->dev) && !pn->dev->offline) { > > > . >
| |