Messages in this thread | | | Date | Sat, 7 Mar 2015 10:55:40 +0800 | Subject | Re: softlockups in multi_cpu_stop | From | Ming Lei <> |
| |
On Sat, Mar 7, 2015 at 10:29 AM, Davidlohr Bueso <dave@stgolabs.net> wrote: > On Fri, 2015-03-06 at 18:26 -0800, Davidlohr Bueso wrote: >> That's not what this is about. New lock _owners_ need to worry about > ^^^ make that "need not"
Sorry, could you explain a bit why new owner can't be scheduled out(on_cpu becomes zero)? If that is possible, it still can cause soft lockup like current problem.
Thanks, Ming Lei
| |