Messages in this thread | | | Date | Thu, 5 Mar 2015 22:13:06 +0100 | From | Peter Zijlstra <> | Subject | Re: Resurrecting the VM_PINNED discussion |
| |
On Thu, Mar 05, 2015 at 03:09:42PM -0600, Christoph Lameter wrote: > On Thu, 5 Mar 2015, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > > > > Am I missing something about why it was never merged? > > > > Because I got lost in IB code and didn't manage to bribe anyone into > > fixing that for me. > > Well the complexity increased since then with the on demand pinning, > mmu notifiers etc etc ...
Clearly I've not been paying attention, what? Is this that drug induced stuff benh was babbling about a while back?
> I thought the clear distinction between pinning and mlocking would do the > trick?
Nah, it still leaves the accounting up shit creek.
| |