Messages in this thread | | | Date | Tue, 31 Mar 2015 10:33:39 -0700 | Subject | Re: [Linux-nvdimm] another pmem variant V2 | From | Dan Williams <> |
| |
On Tue, Mar 31, 2015 at 10:24 AM, Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> wrote: > On Tue, Mar 31, 2015 at 06:44:56PM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote: >> I'd be fine with that too - mind sending an updated series? > > I will send an updated one tonight or early tomorrow. > > Btw, do you want to keep the E820_PRAM name instead of E820_PMEM? > Seems like most people either don't care or prefer E820_PMEM. I'm > fine either way.
FWIW, I like the idea of having a separate E820_PRAM name for type-12 memory vs future "can't yet disclose" UEFI memory type. The E820_PRAM type potentially has the property of being relegated to "legacy" NVDIMMs. We can later add E820_PMEM as a memory type that, for example, is not automatically backed by struct page. That said, I'm fine either way.
| |