Messages in this thread | | | Date | Tue, 24 Mar 2015 14:21:49 +0100 | From | Richard Weinberger <> | Subject | Re: [RFC PATCH 00/11] an introduction of library operating system for Linux (LibOS) |
| |
Am 24.03.2015 um 14:10 schrieb Hajime Tazaki: > == More information == > > The crucial difference between UML (user-mode linux) and this approach > is that we allow multiple network stack instances to co-exist within a > single process with dlmopen(3) like linking for easy debugging.
Is this the only difference? We already have arch/um, why do you need arch/lib/ then? My point is, can't you merge your arch/lib into the existing arch/um stuff? From a very rough look your arch/lib seems like a micro UML.
BTW: There was already an idea for having UML as regular library. See: http://user-mode-linux.sourceforge.net/old/projects.html "UML as a normal userspace library"
Thanks, //richard
| |