lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2015]   [Mar]   [24]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    Date
    From
    SubjectRe: [RFC PATCH 00/11] an introduction of library operating system for Linux (LibOS)
    Am 24.03.2015 um 14:10 schrieb Hajime Tazaki:
    > == More information ==
    >
    > The crucial difference between UML (user-mode linux) and this approach
    > is that we allow multiple network stack instances to co-exist within a
    > single process with dlmopen(3) like linking for easy debugging.

    Is this the only difference?
    We already have arch/um, why do you need arch/lib/ then?
    My point is, can't you merge your arch/lib into the existing arch/um stuff?
    From a very rough look your arch/lib seems like a micro UML.

    BTW: There was already an idea for having UML as regular library.
    See: http://user-mode-linux.sourceforge.net/old/projects.html
    "UML as a normal userspace library"

    Thanks,
    //richard


    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2015-03-24 14:41    [W:2.372 / U:0.012 seconds]
    ©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site