lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2015]   [Mar]   [2]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH v2 0/7] The power allocator thermal governor
On Thu, Feb 26, 2015 at 10:16:09PM +0000, Eduardo Valentin wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 26, 2015 at 07:00:26PM +0000, Javi Merino wrote:
> > Hi linux-pm,
> >
> > The power allocator governor allocates device power to control
> > temperature. This requires transforming performance requests into
> > requested power, which we do with an extended cooling device API
> > introduced in patch 2 (thermal: extend the cooling device API to
> > include power information). Patch 3 (thermal: cpu_cooling: implement
> > the power cooling device API) extends the cpu cooling device using a
> > simple power model.
> >
> > This series are based on branch "linus" of Eduardo's linux-soc-thermal
> > tree:
> >
> > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/evalenti/linux-soc-thermal.git
> >
> > Changes since v1:
> > - Removed a memory leak pointed out by Steve Rostedt
> > - Relax the constraint of the trip points to be the first and last
> > passive trip point as Lina Iyer suggested.
> > - Update how the governor treats weights to mimic the behavior of
> > fair share in v3 of the weight fixes series.
> > - Don't cache the cpufreq_cooling_device and scan for it whenever
> > we need it.
> > - Consider the rate of changes in the derivative term of the PID
> > controller
> >
> > Changes since RFC v6:
> > - Addressed Eduardo's review
> > + Pass the interval to the static power function as suggested by
> > Eduardo
> > + Make the cooling device ops return 0 or -E* and put the
> > calculation in a parameter, like the rest of the cooling device
> > ops
> > + Documentation improvements
> > - Use thermal_cdev_update() to change cooling device states
> > - Add a patch to export the power allocator governor's tzp
> > parameters to sysfs
> >
> > Changes since RFC v5:
> > - Addressed Stephen's review of the trace patches.
> > - Removed power actors and extended the cooling device interface
> > instead.
> > - Let platforms override the power allocator governor parameters in
> > their thermal zone parameters
> >
> > Changes since RFC v4:
> > - Add more tracing
> > - Document some of the limitations of the power allocator governor
> > - Export the power_actor API and move power_actor.h to include/linux
> >
> > Changes since RFC v3:
> > - Use tz->passive to poll faster when the first trip point is hit.
> > - Don't make a special directory for power_actors
> > - Add a DT property for sustainable-power
> > - Simplify the static power interface and pass the current thermal
> > zone in every power_actor_ops to remove the controversial
> > enum power_actor_types
> > - Use locks with the actor_list list
> > - Use cpufreq_get() to get the frequency of the cpu instead of
> > using the notifiers.
> > - Remove the prompt for THERMAL_POWER_ACTOR_CPU when configuring
> > the kernel
> >
> > Changes since RFC v2:
> > - Changed the PI controller into a PID controller
> > - Added static power to the cpu power model
> > - tz parameter max_dissipatable_power renamed to sustainable_power
> > - Register the cpufreq cooling device as part of the
> > power_cpu_actor registration.
> >
> > Changes since RFC v1:
> > - Fixed finding cpufreq cooling devices in cpufreq_frequency_change()
> > - Replaced the cooling device interface with a separate power actor
> > API
> > - Addressed most of Eduardo's comments
> > - Incorporated ftrace support for bitmask to trace cpumasks
> >
> > Cheers,
> > Javi & Punit
> >
> > Javi Merino (6):
> > thermal: let governors have private data for each thermal zone
> > thermal: extend the cooling device API to include power information
> > thermal: cpu_cooling: implement the power cooling device API
> > thermal: introduce the Power Allocator governor
> > thermal: add trace events to the power allocator governor
> > thermal: export thermal_zone_parameters to sysfs
>
> I am applying patches 1-3 and 6.

Patch 6 depends on patch 4, as it accesses tzp->sustainable_power
which is introduced in patch 4. Can you unapply it and keep the
order?

> Patches 4 and 7 need extra effort, but are
> minor changes. Patch 5 depends on 4, so, cannot be applied now.

I'll send a v3 with the minor changes based on your linus branch later
today.

Cheers,
Javi


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2015-03-02 17:41    [W:0.149 / U:0.144 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site