Messages in this thread | | | Date | Mon, 16 Mar 2015 22:05:32 +0100 | From | Pavel Machek <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH v3 3/6] Documentation: DT: Document twl4030-madc-battery bindings |
| |
On Wed 2015-02-04 23:14:32, Marek Belisko wrote: > Signed-off-by: Marek Belisko <marek@goldelico.com> > --- > .../bindings/power_supply/twl4030_madc_battery.txt | 43 ++++++++++++++++++++++ > 1 file changed, 43 insertions(+) > create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/power_supply/twl4030_madc_battery.txt > > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/power_supply/twl4030_madc_battery.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/power_supply/twl4030_madc_battery.txt > new file mode 100644 > index 0000000..bb3580c > --- /dev/null > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/power_supply/twl4030_madc_battery.txt > @@ -0,0 +1,43 @@ > +twl4030_madc_battery > + > +Required properties: > + - compatible : "ti,twl4030-madc-battery" > + - capacity-uah : battery capacity in uAh
Could we make it capacity-uAh ?
> + - volt-to-capacity-charging-map : list of voltage(mV):level(%) values > + for charging calibration (see example) > + - volt-to-capacity-discharging-map : list of voltage(mV):level(%) values > + for discharging calibration (see example)
Would "mV-to-capacity..." be more accurate? Also, would it make sense to introduce coefficients for temperature and discharge rate?
Thanks, Pavel -- (english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek (cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html
| |