lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2015]   [Feb]   [4]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH 1/5] WIP: Add syscall unlinkat_s (currently x86* only)
On Wed, 4 Feb 2015, Alexander Holler wrote:

> Date: Wed, 04 Feb 2015 17:12:52 +0100
> From: Alexander Holler <holler@ahsoftware.de>
> To: Lukáš Czerner <lczerner@redhat.com>
> Cc: Michael Kerrisk <mtk.manpages@gmail.com>,
> Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>, Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>,
> Linux-Fsdevel <linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>,
> Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
> Linux API <linux-api@vger.kernel.org>
> Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/5] WIP: Add syscall unlinkat_s (currently x86* only)
>
> Am 04.02.2015 um 15:52 schrieb Lukáš Czerner:
> > On Wed, 4 Feb 2015, Alexander Holler wrote:
>
> >> I'm happy for all the feedback. But it doesn't help me. I'm not going to spend
> >> the necessary time unpaid.
> >
> > Right, you'd much rather have someone else to spend the time on your
> > request unpaid. That's understandable, but unreasonable. You want
> > it, implement it, or pay someone else to do it for you.
>
> Maybe you should attach a big fat red warning to the kernels bugzilla
> that filing a bug means either to fix it yourself or pay somone to do that.
>
> I've never demanded that someone else fixes it.
>
> I've just explained a problem.
>
> Unbelievable how someone could do such without paying someone else to
> fix it or by fixing it themself ...

It's not a bug, you're requesting a feature.
\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2015-02-04 17:41    [W:0.119 / U:1.208 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site