Messages in this thread | | | Subject | Re: [PATCH 3/3] tomoyo: robustify handling of mm->exe_file | From | Davidlohr Bueso <> | Date | Thu, 19 Feb 2015 10:22:33 -0800 |
| |
On Thu, 2015-02-19 at 20:07 +0900, Tetsuo Handa wrote: > Why do we need to let the caller call path_put() ? > There is no need to do like proc_exe_link() does, for > tomoyo_get_exe() returns pathname as "char *".
Having the pathname doesn't guarantee anything later, and thus doesn't seem very robust in the manager call if it can be dropped during the call... or can this never occur in this context?
| |