lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2015]   [Dec]   [4]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
Patch in this message
/
SubjectRe: mtd, nand, omap2: parse cmdline partition fail
From
Date
Hello Frans,

Am 04.12.2015 um 08:17 schrieb Frans Klaver:
> On Fri, Dec 4, 2015 at 7:48 AM, Heiko Schocher <hs@denx.de> wrote:
>> Hello Frans,
>>
>> I just tried current mainline kernel:
>> commit 2255702db4014d1c69d6037ed7bdad2d2e271985
>> Merge: 9e5d25e c86576e
>> Author: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
>> Date: Mon Nov 30 16:06:44 2015 -0800
>>
>> Merge tag 'mn10300-for-linus-v4.4-rc4' of
>> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/groeck/linux-staging
>>
>> on an am3517 based board (mainlining soon). And with your commit:
>> commit 853f1c58c4b2: mtd: nand: omap2: show parent device structure in sysfs
>>
>> MTD partitions from cmdline are not longer detected:
>>
>> [ 2.087305] nand: device found, Manufacturer ID: 0x2c, Chip ID: 0xcc
>> [ 2.094097] nand: Micron MT29F4G16ABADAWP
>> [ 2.098303] nand: 512 MiB, SLC, erase size: 128 KiB, page size: 2048, OOB
>> size: 64
>> [ 2.106296] nand: WARNING: MT29F4G16ABADAWP: the ECC used on your system
>> is too weak compared to the one required by the NAND chip
>> [ 2.118674] MT29F4G16ABADAWP: 'partitions' subnode not found on
>> /ocp/gpmc@6e000000/nand@0,0. Trying to parse direct subnodes as partitions.
>> [...]
>>
>> before this patch it worked:
>> [ 2.307444] nand: device found, Manufacturer ID: 0x2c, Chip ID: 0xcc
>> [ 2.314092] nand: Micron MT29F4G16ABADAWP
>> [ 2.318348] nand: 512 MiB, SLC, erase size: 128 KiB, page size: 2048, OOB
>> size: 64
>> [ 2.326331] nand: WARNING: omap2-nand.0: the ECC used on your system is
>> too weak compared to the one required by the NAND chip
>> [ 2.338336] 5 cmdlinepart partitions found on MTD device omap2-nand.0
>> [ 2.345129] Creating 5 MTD partitions on "omap2-nand.0":
>> [ 2.350704] 0x000000000000-0x000000080000 : "MLO"
>> [ 2.366877] 0x000000080000-0x000000180000 : "u-boot"
>> [ 2.379179] 0x000000180000-0x0000001c0000 : "env1"
>> [ 2.390627] 0x0000001c0000-0x000000200000 : "env2"
>> [ 2.402255] 0x000000200000-0x000020000000 : "common_data"
>>
>> Reason is taht the mtd->name has changed from "omap2-nand.0" to the
>> nand chip name ...
>>
>> If I revert this part from the patch
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/mtd/nand/omap2.c b/drivers/mtd/nand/omap2.c
>> index 93f664c..28dcf66 100644
>> --- a/drivers/mtd/nand/omap2.c
>> +++ b/drivers/mtd/nand/omap2.c
>> @@ -1685,6 +1685,7 @@ static int omap_nand_probe(struct platform_device
>> *pdev)
>> info->ecc_opt = pdata->ecc_opt;
>> mtd = &info->mtd;
>> mtd->priv = &info->nand;
>> + mtd->name = dev_name(&pdev->dev);
>> mtd->dev.parent = &pdev->dev;
>> nand_chip = &info->nand;
>> nand_chip->ecc.priv = NULL;
>>
>> It works again ...
>>
>> So the question is, is it intended to change the "mtd->name"?
>
> That's definitely not intended. The expectation with this patch is
> that nothing really changes, except that a parent device link is
> available in sysfs. For the name this patch depends on 807f16d4db956
> ("mtd: core: set some defaults when dev.parent is set") which does
> something like:
>
> if (mtd->dev.parent) {
> if (!mtd->name)
> mtd->name = dev_name(mtd->dev.parent);
> }

commit 807f16d4db956 is in the tree... ok.

Hmm... I see in drivers/mtd/nand/omap2.c omap_nand_probe()
info gets allocated with devm_kzalloc(), then info->mtd gets filled.

Without setting "mtd->name = dev_name(&pdev->dev);"
mtd->name never gets filled ... or?

It seems to me add_mtd_device() gets only called for the mtd partitions
parsed from the cmdline ...

I added to my patch above following debug printk:
diff --git a/drivers/mtd/mtdcore.c b/drivers/mtd/mtdcore.c
index 95c13b2..f1a95eb 100644
--- a/drivers/mtd/mtdcore.c
+++ b/drivers/mtd/mtdcore.c
@@ -426,6 +426,9 @@ int add_mtd_device(struct mtd_info *mtd)
mtd->erasesize_mask = (1 << mtd->erasesize_shift) - 1;
mtd->writesize_mask = (1 << mtd->writesize_shift) - 1;

+ printk("%s: ******* mtd->name: %s\n", __func__, mtd->name);
+ if (mtd->dev.parent)
+ printk("%s: *******parent name: %s\n", __func__, dev_name(mtd->dev.parent));
if (mtd->dev.parent) {
if (!mtd->owner && mtd->dev.parent->driver)
mtd->owner = mtd->dev.parent->driver->owner;
Log with them:
[ 2.613797] mtdoops: mtd device (mtddev=name/number) must be supplied
[ 2.623417] nand: device found, Manufacturer ID: 0x2c, Chip ID: 0xcc
[ 2.630077] nand: Micron MT29F4G16ABADAWP
[ 2.634395] nand: 512 MiB, SLC, erase size: 128 KiB, page size: 2048, OOB size: 64
[ 2.642402] nand: WARNING: omap2-nand.0: the ECC used on your system is too weak compared to the
one required by the NAND chip
[ 2.654412] 5 cmdlinepart partitions found on MTD device omap2-nand.0
[ 2.661213] Creating 5 MTD partitions on "omap2-nand.0":
[ 2.666785] 0x000000000000-0x000000080000 : "MLO"
[ 2.672755] add_mtd_device: ******* mtd->name: MLO
[ 2.677775] add_mtd_device: *******parent name: omap2-nand.0
[ 2.693967] 0x000000080000-0x000000180000 : "u-boot"
[ 2.700097] add_mtd_device: ******* mtd->name: u-boot
[ 2.705490] add_mtd_device: *******parent name: omap2-nand.0
[ 2.717487] 0x000000180000-0x0000001c0000 : "env1"
[ 2.722902] add_mtd_device: ******* mtd->name: env1
[ 2.728010] add_mtd_device: *******parent name: omap2-nand.0
[ 2.739992] 0x0000001c0000-0x000000200000 : "env2"
[ 2.745401] add_mtd_device: ******* mtd->name: env2
[ 2.750505] add_mtd_device: *******parent name: omap2-nand.0
[ 2.762875] 0x000000200000-0x000020000000 : "common_data"
[ 3.218895] add_mtd_device: ******* mtd->name: common_data
[ 3.224686] add_mtd_device: *******parent name: omap2-nand.0
No other "add_mtd_device:" output ...

> The fact that this produces different names for you is slightly
> surprising to me, unless mtd->name is already set to something by the
> time it reaches add_mtd_device(). Or I overlooked something, which is
> entirely plausible as well.
>
> So effectively this should be the same as doing:
>
> mtd->dev.parent = &pdev->dev;
> mtd->name = dev_name(mtd->dev.parent);
>
>
>> But wondering, if there are two or more identical nand chips in the
>> system, they will have the same mtd->name ... which seems buggy to me...
>
> Agree.

Good, so we must fix it ;-)

bye,
Heiko
--
DENX Software Engineering GmbH, Managing Director: Wolfgang Denk
HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2015-12-04 10:01    [W:0.075 / U:0.648 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site