lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2015]   [Dec]   [4]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH v2 0/4] Add online file check feature
On Fri 2015-12-04 01:36:21, Gang He wrote:
> Hi Greg,
>
>
> >>>
> > On Wed, Dec 02, 2015 at 07:05:27PM -0700, Gang He wrote:
> >> Hello Pavel,
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> >>>
> >> > On Wed 2015-10-28 14:25:57, Gang He wrote:
> >> >> When there are errors in the ocfs2 filesystem,
> >> >> they are usually accompanied by the inode number which caused the error.
> >> >> This inode number would be the input to fixing the file.
> >> >> One of these options could be considered:
> >> >> A file in the sys filesytem which would accept inode numbers.
> >> >> This could be used to communication back what has to be fixed or is fixed.
> >> >> You could write:
> >> >> $# echo "CHECK <inode>" > /sys/fs/ocfs2/devname/filecheck
> >> >> or
> >> >> $# echo "FIX <inode>" > /sys/fs/ocfs2/devname/filecheck
> >> >>
> >> >
> >> > Are you sure this is reasonable interface? I mean.... sysfs is
> >> > supposed to be one value per file. And I don't think its suitable for
> >> > running commands.
> >> Usually, the corrupted file (inode) should be rarely encountered for OCFS2
> > file system, then
> >> lots of commands are executed via this interface with high performance is
> > not expected by us.
> >> Second, after online file check is added, we also plan to add a mount option
> > "error=fix", that means
> >> the file system can fix these errors automatically without a manual command
> > triggering.
> >
> > It's not a "performance" issue, it's a "sysfs files only have one value"
> > type thing. Have two files, "inode_fix" and "inode_check" and then just
> > write the inode into them, no need to have a "verb <inode>" type parser.
> Current, we have three functional items "check, fix and set", in the future, maybe we can add more item.
> Then, for each functional item, we need to create a sys file and add related code (actual some code is duplicated),
> I prefer to one sys file to handle multiple sub-commands.

And we prefer not to have your code in tree.

Please design some reasonable interface. Abusing sysfs for this is not
right.
Pavel
--
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2015-12-04 11:01    [W:0.139 / U:0.984 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site