lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2015]   [Nov]   [9]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: kdbus refactoring?
On Mon, Nov 09, 2015 at 10:28:42AM +0100, Richard Weinberger wrote:
> Am 09.11.2015 um 10:19 schrieb David Herrmann:
> > On Mon, Nov 9, 2015 at 10:14 AM, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> wrote:
> >> On Mon, Nov 09, 2015 at 09:56:04AM +0100, David Herrmann wrote:
> >>
> >>> The submission and following year of development followed the 'kernel
> >>> way'.
> >>
> >> This is not true; the last complete posting I could find was:
> >>
> >> Date: Mon, 9 Mar 2015 14:09:06 +0100
> >> Subject: [PATCH v4 00/14] Add kdbus implementation
> >
> > ..which was the last time we proposed it for inclusion.
>
> Guys, let's cool down. :-)
>
> What Peter is complaining about is that since the last proposal a lot
> of iterative patches and even pull requests were sent instead of
> complete patch series.
> The expectation was that you send patch series with fixes folded in
> as long the review takes.

And that will happen, when the code is ready, nothing different is
happening here from any other code submission. I don't know why people
somehow think we don't know how to do this whole thing, it's as if they
don't trust us, which is sad.

greg k-h


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2015-11-09 16:21    [W:0.048 / U:0.808 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site