Messages in this thread | | | Date | Mon, 30 Nov 2015 19:05:26 +0530 | From | Viresh Kumar <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH 5/6] cpufreq: governor: replace per-cpu delayed work with timers |
| |
On 30-11-15, 13:05, Lucas Stach wrote: > I don't want to block this patch on that, but maybe as a thought for > further consideration: Wouldn't it make sense to use a single unbound > deferrable work item for this? There was some work to make this possible > already: "timer: make deferrable cpu unbound timers really not bound to > a cpu"
Yes, it would be sensible but that work has gone nowhere since April. Once that is merged, we can think about it.
-- viresh
| |