lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2015]   [Nov]   [3]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH 4/4] Input: tsc2004 - Document ts2004 dt bindings
On Tue, Nov 03, 2015 at 05:11:56PM -0600, Michael Welling wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 03, 2015 at 02:59:13PM -0800, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
> > On Tue, Nov 03, 2015 at 09:41:17AM -0600, Michael Welling wrote:
> > > On Tue, Nov 03, 2015 at 09:31:10AM -0600, Rob Herring wrote:
> > > > On Tue, Nov 3, 2015 at 1:21 AM, Dmitry Torokhov
> > > > <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > On Mon, Nov 02, 2015 at 02:50:29PM -0600, Michael Welling wrote:
> > > > >> On Mon, Nov 02, 2015 at 09:19:50AM -0600, Rob Herring wrote:
> > > > >> > > +Required properties:
> > > > >> > > + - compatible : "ti,tsc2004"
> > > > >> > > + - interrupts : IRQ specifier
> > > > >> > > + - vio-supply : Regulator specifier
> > > > >> >
> > > > >> > reg property?
> > > > >>
> > > > >> Rob,
> > > > >>
> > > > >> It appears that I missed this in the description.
> > > > >>
> > > > >> Probably because I was following the lead of the ts2005 description.
> > > > >>
> > > > >> How does this look:
> > > > >> - reg : I2C address. 0x48 - 0x4b based on the voltage applied to
> > > > >> the AD1 and AD0 inputs on the IC.
> > > > >>
> > > > >
> > > > > How about the version below?
> > > > >
> > > > > Thanks.
> > > > >
> > > > > --
> > > > > Dmitry
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > Input: tsc2004 - document ts2004 dt bindings
> > >
> > > Just noticed that it says ts2004 instead of tsc2004 in the subject.
> > > Otherwise, I am fine with it.
> > >
> > > Thanks for the assistance.
> > >
> > > Still no acks or reviews for the other patches in the series.
> > > I would like for someone to test the tsc2005 support to see if it still works.
> > >
> > > The tsc2004 works very well on the target that I have here.
> >
> > I folded this patch into the patch #3 and applied everything.
> >
>
> Great.
>
> Will this patch series conflict with the patch series to take out the .owner=THIS_MODULE
> from spi_drivers?
>
> https://www.mail-archive.com/linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org/msg1004626.html

If he tries to get them in one pass - probably, but the conflicts should
be trivial and should be easily resolved by SPI maintainer and/or Linus.

Or he could split the patch per-subsystem.

Thanks.

--
Dmitry


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2015-11-04 00:41    [W:0.056 / U:0.024 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site