lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2015]   [Nov]   [24]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
SubjectRe: [4.3] kworker busy in pm_runtime_work
From
On 23 November 2015 at 23:52, Alan Stern <stern@rowland.harvard.edu> wrote:
> On Sun, 22 Nov 2015, Daniel J Blueman wrote:
>
>> On 16 November 2015 at 23:22, Alan Stern <stern@rowland.harvard.edu> wrote:
>> > On Mon, 16 Nov 2015, Daniel J Blueman wrote:
>> >
>> >> Tuning USB suspend [1] in 4.3 on a Dell XPS 15 9553 (Skylake), I see a
>> >> kworker thread spinning in rpm_suspend [2].
>> >>
>> >> What is the most useful debug to get here beyond the immediate [3]?
>> >
>> > You can try doing:
>> >
>> > echo 'module usbcore =p' >/sys/kernel/debug/dynamic_debug/control
>>
>> kworker and ksoftirqd spinning occurs when I echo 'auto' to all the
>> USB control entries. Using Alan's excellent tip, we see this being
>> logged repeatedly at a high rate:
>> [ 353.245180] usb usb1-port4: status 0107 change 0000
>> [ 353.245194] usb usb1-port12: status 0507 change 0000
>> [ 353.245202] hub 1-0:1.0: state 7 ports 16 chg 0000 evt 0000
>> [ 353.245203] hub 1-0:1.0: hub_suspend
>> [ 353.245205] usb usb1: bus auto-suspend, wakeup 1
>> [ 353.245206] usb usb1: bus suspend fail, err -16
>> [ 353.245207] hub 1-0:1.0: hub_resume
>> ...
>>
>> So, EBUSY. Both the webcam is not open, and the bluetooth interface
>> [1] is rfkill'd; the situation occurs even if I unload all related
>> modules.
>>
>> What further debug would be useful?
>>
>> Thanks!
>> Daniel
>>
>> -- [1]
>>
>> Bus 002 Device 001: ID 1d6b:0003 Linux Foundation 3.0 root hub
>> Bus 001 Device 002: ID 0a5c:6410 Broadcom Corp.
>> Bus 001 Device 003: ID 1bcf:2b95 Sunplus Innovation Technology Inc.
>> Bus 001 Device 001: ID 1d6b:0002 Linux Foundation 2.0 root hub
>
> Since bus 1 uses an xHCI controller, you should do:
>
> echo 'module xhci-hcd =p' >/sys/kernel/debug/dynamic_debug/control
>
> I'm reasonably sure this will end up printing "suspend failed
> because a port is resuming", since that's the only place where
> xhci_bus_suspend() fails with -EBUSY, but you should try it to confirm
> this.

I had to use:
echo 'module xhci_hcd =p' >/sys/kernel/debug/dynamic_debug/control

and indeed we see:
[29172.246221] xhci_hcd 0000:00:14.0: get port status, actual port 11
status = 0xe63
[29172.246222] xhci_hcd 0000:00:14.0: Get port status returned 0x507
[29172.246224] xhci_hcd 0000:00:14.0: get port status, actual port 12
status = 0x2a0
[29172.246228] xhci_hcd 0000:00:14.0: get port status, actual port 13
status = 0x2a0
[29172.246228] xhci_hcd 0000:00:14.0: Get port status returned 0x100
[29172.246231] xhci_hcd 0000:00:14.0: get port status, actual port 14
status = 0x2a0
[29172.246232] xhci_hcd 0000:00:14.0: Get port status returned 0x100
[29172.246235] xhci_hcd 0000:00:14.0: Get port status returned 0x100
[29172.246248] xhci_hcd 0000:00:14.0: Get port status returned 0x100
[29172.246254] xhci_hcd 0000:00:14.0: Get port status returned 0x100
[29172.246264] xhci_hcd 0000:00:14.0: Get port status returned 0x100
[29172.246275] xhci_hcd 0000:00:14.0: Get port status returned 0x100
[29172.246285] xhci_hcd 0000:00:14.0: Get port status returned 0x507
[29172.246294] xhci_hcd 0000:00:14.0: get port status, actual port 14
status = 0x2a0
[29172.246302] xhci_hcd 0000:00:14.0: suspend failed because a port is resuming
[29172.246321] xhci_hcd 0000:00:14.0: Get port status returned 0x107
[29172.246332] xhci_hcd 0000:00:14.0: get port status, actual port 6
status = 0x2a0
[29172.246346] xhci_hcd 0000:00:14.0: Get port status returned 0x100
[29172.246359] xhci_hcd 0000:00:14.0: get port status, actual port 13
status = 0x2a0
[29172.246364] xhci_hcd 0000:00:14.0: Get port status returned 0x100
[29172.246366] xhci_hcd 0000:00:14.0: get port status, actual port 15
status = 0x2a0
[29172.246371] xhci_hcd 0000:00:14.0: suspend failed because a port is resuming
[29172.246380] xhci_hcd 0000:00:14.0: Get port status returned 0x100
[29172.246382] xhci_hcd 0000:00:14.0: get port status, actual port 1
status = 0x2a0
[29172.246383] xhci_hcd 0000:00:14.0: Get port status returned 0x100
...
--
Daniel J Blueman


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2015-11-24 23:41    [W:0.053 / U:1.528 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site