Messages in this thread | | | Date | Fri, 20 Nov 2015 09:36:00 -0500 | From | Christopher Covington <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH v11 3/5] arm: introduce CONFIG_PARAVIRT, PARAVIRT_TIME_ACCOUNTING and pv_time_ops |
| |
Hi Stefano,
On 11/20/2015 09:31 AM, Stefano Stabellini wrote: > On Tue, 10 Nov 2015, Stefano Stabellini wrote: >> On Thu, 5 Nov 2015, Stefano Stabellini wrote: >>> Introduce CONFIG_PARAVIRT and PARAVIRT_TIME_ACCOUNTING on ARM. >>> >>> The only paravirt interface supported is pv_time_ops.steal_clock, so no >>> runtime pvops patching needed. >>> >>> This allows us to make use of steal_account_process_tick for stolen >>> ticks accounting. >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Stefano Stabellini <stefano.stabellini@eu.citrix.com> >>> Acked-by: Christopher Covington <cov@codeaurora.org> >>> Acked-by: Ian Campbell <ian.campbell@citrix.com> >>> CC: linux@arm.linux.org.uk >>> CC: will.deacon@arm.com >>> CC: nico@linaro.org >>> CC: marc.zyngier@arm.com >>> CC: cov@codeaurora.org >>> CC: arnd@arndb.de >>> CC: olof@lixom.net >> >> >> Russell, >> are you OK with this patch? > > Russell, > > I am going to drop this patch and add a small #ifdef to > arch/arm/xen/enlighten.c to be able to use this functionality on arm64. > > If you change your mind let me know.
It appears to me as though he's not copied on this message.
Regards, Christopher Covington
-- Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum, a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project
| |