lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2015]   [Nov]   [2]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: [PATCH v5 1/5] Documentation: tps65912: Add DT bindings for the TPS65912 PMIC
From
Date
On 11/02/2015 03:17 AM, Lee Jones wrote:
> On Fri, 30 Oct 2015, Andrew F. Davis wrote:
>
>> On 10/30/2015 02:06 PM, Lee Jones wrote:
>>> On Fri, 30 Oct 2015, Andrew F. Davis wrote:
>>>
>>>> On 10/30/2015 12:10 PM, Lee Jones wrote:
>>>>> On Thu, 29 Oct 2015, Andrew F. Davis wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> The TPS65912 PMIC contains several regulators and a GPIO controller.
>>>>>> Add bindings for the TPS65912 PMIC.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Signed-off-by: Andrew F. Davis <afd@ti.com>
>>>>>> ---
>>>>>> .../devicetree/bindings/gpio/gpio-tps65912.txt | 16 +++++++
>>>>>
>>>>> Why have you dropped Linus' Review-by?
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Strange, I thought I made a change to this. Well this brings up a question,
>>>> how much change can we have before we are supposed to drop Reviewed/Acked-by?
>>>
>>> Common sense call I'm afraid. ;)
>>>
>>> [...]
>>>
>>>>>> + the second cell is used to specify flags.
>>>>>> + See include/dt-bindings/gpio/gpio.h for possible values.
>>>>>
>>>>> This is a Linuxisum and shouldn't really live in here.
>>>>>
>>>>> I think it would be better to document them in ../gpio/gpio.txt and
>>>>> reference that instead.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Looks like that is already in ../gpio/gpio.txt:57
>>>
>>> There is a mention of GPIO_ACTIVE_HIGH, as it's used in an example.
>>> However GPIO_ACTIVE_LOW is missing. I think both could do with
>>> documenting properly, then you can refer to them from here.
>>>
>>
>> I mean the lines above the example, they say to use the macros
>> defined in include/dt-bindings/gpio/gpio.h whenever possible,
>> that's really all I would say.
>
> Let's at least attempt to stick to the rules.
>
> Please adapt your formatting to <dt-bindings/gpio/gpio.h> in order to
> eradicate any Linuxiness.
>

Works for me, although I pushed v6 a couple days ago with a different
fix, maybe that will work too?

>>> [...]
>>>
>>>>>> +Required properties:
>>>>>> + - compatible : Should be "ti,tps65912".
>>>>>> + - reg : Slave address or chip select number (I2C / SPI).
>>>>>> + - interrupt-parent : The parent interrupt controller.
>>>>>> + - interrupts : The interrupt line the device is connected to.
>>>>>> + - interrupt-controller : Marks the device node as an interrupt controller.
>>>>>> + - #interrupt-cells: The number of cells to describe an IRQ, this should be 2.
>>>>>> + The first cell is the IRQ number.
>>>>>> + The second cell is the flags, encoded as the trigger masks from
>>>>>> + ../interrupt-controller/interrupts.txt
>>>>>
>>>>> Nit: We *normally* treat these as bullet-points and not place
>>>>> full-stops on them:
>>>>>
>>>>> $ git grep "compatible" -- Documentation/devicetree/bindings/ | grep -v "\.$" | wc -l
>>>>> 5227
>>>>> $ git grep "compatible.*\.$" -- Documentation/devicetree/bindings/ | wc -l
>>>>> 486
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> What about for multi-sentence descriptions, we need the middle full-stops, then to not
>>>> have one on the end seems kinda odd looking.
>>>
>>> That's the way I usually do it -- doesn't look too bad. ;)
>>>
>>> [...]
>>>
>


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2015-11-02 16:21    [W:0.405 / U:0.048 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site