lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2015]   [Nov]   [18]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: [PATCH 3/3] ARM64: dts: enable clock support for Broadcom NS2
From
Date


On 11/18/2015 4:07 PM, Florian Fainelli wrote:
> On 18/11/15 16:03, Ray Jui wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 11/18/2015 3:13 PM, Jon Mason wrote:
>>> Add device tree entries for clock support for Broadcom Northstar 2 SoC
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Jon Mason <jonmason@broadcom.com>
>>> ---
>>> arch/arm64/boot/dts/broadcom/ns2.dtsi | 80
>>> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
>>> 1 file changed, 79 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/broadcom/ns2.dtsi
>>> b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/broadcom/ns2.dtsi
>>> index 9610822..a510d3a 100644
>>> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/broadcom/ns2.dtsi
>>> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/broadcom/ns2.dtsi
>>> @@ -31,6 +31,7 @@
>>> */
>>>
>>> #include <dt-bindings/interrupt-controller/arm-gic.h>
>>> +#include <dt-bindings/clock/bcm-ns2.h>
>>>
>>> /memreserve/ 0x84b00000 0x00000008;
>>>
>>> @@ -109,6 +110,33 @@
>>> <&A57_3>;
>>> };
>>>
>>> + clocks {
>>
>> Is this a new convention? That is, group all clocks without a base
>> register address in a node named "clocks", but at the same time, put all
>> other clocks with base register address under a bus node.
>
> I do not think that is new, lots of platforms do that. The clock
> providers/controllers would typically be in the 'bus' nodes because it
> has a register interface, while the synthetic clocks would be under
> 'clocks'.
>

Okay that's very good to know. Thanks!

Ray


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2015-11-19 01:21    [W:0.030 / U:46.864 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site