Messages in this thread | | | From | Arnd Bergmann <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH 02/13] dmaengine: Introduce dma_request_slave_channel_compat_reason() | Date | Wed, 18 Nov 2015 16:51:54 +0100 |
| |
On Wednesday 18 November 2015 17:43:04 Andy Shevchenko wrote: > > > > I assume that the sst-firmware.c case is a mistake, it should just use a > > plain DMA_SLAVE and not DMA_MEMCPY. > > Other way around. >
Ok, I see. In that case I guess it also shouldn't call dmaengine_slave_config(), right? I don't think that's valid on a MEMCPY channel.
Arnd
| |