Messages in this thread | | | Date | Wed, 18 Nov 2015 16:21:27 +0100 (CET) | From | Thomas Gleixner <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH 3/4] sched: introduce synchronized idle injection |
| |
On Wed, 18 Nov 2015, Jacob Pan wrote: > On Wed, 18 Nov 2015 15:09:44 +0000 > Morten Rasmussen <morten.rasmussen@arm.com> wrote: > > > Okay. But it does mean that the defeault idle period is 5 ticks (50ms > > @ HZ=100) and not 5 ms > correct. my reason is to scale with various HZ values.
So for smaller HZ values we get longer disruption. That's well thought out scaling.
Thanks,
tglx
| |