lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2015]   [Nov]   [13]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
SubjectRE: [PATCH] IB/sa: replace GFP_KERNEL with GFP_ATOMIC
Date
I don't think so. 

The following patch has rendered this patch unnecessary:

https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/7526811/

Kaike

> -----Original Message-----
> From: linux-rdma-owner@vger.kernel.org [mailto:linux-rdma-
> owner@vger.kernel.org] On Behalf Of Saurabh Sengar
> Sent: Friday, November 13, 2015 2:42 AM
> To: Weiny, Ira; Wan, Kaike
> Cc: Hefty, Sean; hal.rosenstock@gmail.com; dledford@redhat.com; linux-
> rdma@vger.kernel.org; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
> Subject: Re: [PATCH] IB/sa: replace GFP_KERNEL with GFP_ATOMIC
>
> On Wed, 28 Oct 2015 at 04:30:10 +0000, Weiny, Ira wrote:
> > Until we can remove the spinlock the current proposed patch should be
> > applied in the interim. Sorry for the noise before.
>
> > Reviewed-By: Ira Weiny <ira.weiny@intel.com>
>
> Hi,
>
> is this patch expected to be applied ?
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rdma" in the
> body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at
> http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2015-11-13 12:01    [W:0.076 / U:0.888 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site