lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2015]   [Nov]   [10]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
Patch in this message
/
Date
From
Subject[patch v2] ncpfs: don't allow negative timeouts
This code causes a static checker warning because it's a user controlled
variable where we cap the upper bound but not the lower bound. Let's
return an -EINVAL for negative timeouts.

Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>
---
v2: in the original I just ignored the invalid data and went with the
default but now it returns -EINVAL.

diff --git a/fs/ncpfs/ioctl.c b/fs/ncpfs/ioctl.c
index 79b1130..ebf45d2 100644
--- a/fs/ncpfs/ioctl.c
+++ b/fs/ncpfs/ioctl.c
@@ -525,7 +525,9 @@ static long __ncp_ioctl(struct inode *inode, unsigned int cmd, unsigned long arg
switch (rqdata.cmd) {
case NCP_LOCK_EX:
case NCP_LOCK_SH:
- if (rqdata.timeout == 0)
+ if (rqdata.timeout < 0)
+ return -EINVAL;
+ else if (rqdata.timeout == 0)
rqdata.timeout = NCP_LOCK_DEFAULT_TIMEOUT;
else if (rqdata.timeout > NCP_LOCK_MAX_TIMEOUT)
rqdata.timeout = NCP_LOCK_MAX_TIMEOUT;

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2015-11-10 23:21    [W:1.525 / U:0.092 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site