Messages in this thread | | | Subject | Re: [PATCH] extcon: add MAX3355 driver | From | Sergei Shtylyov <> | Date | Tue, 10 Nov 2015 14:03:21 +0300 |
| |
Hello.
On 11/10/2015 2:52 AM, Chanwoo Choi wrote:
> I received the reply from you after too long time (17~18day). > You better to reply it more a little more quickly > if you have the question or new patches.
I've replied as soon as I had my new idea.
>>>>>>> MAX3355E chip integrates a charge pump and comparators to enable a system with >>>>>>> an integrated USB OTG dual-role transceiver to function as a USB OTG dual-role >>>>>>> device. In addition to sensing/controlling Vbus, the chip also passes thru the >>>>>>> ID signal from the USB OTG connector. On some Renesas boards, this signal is >>>>>>> just fed into the SoC thru a GPIO pin -- there's no real OTG controller, only >>>>>>> host and gadget USB controllers sharing the same USB bus; however, we'd like >>>>>>> to allow host or gadget drivers to be loaded depending on the cable type, >>>>>>> hence >>>>>>> the need for the MAX3355 extcon driver. The Vbus status signals are also wired >>>>>>> to GPIOs (however, we're not currently intested in them), the OFFVBUS# signal >>>>>>> is controlled by the host controllers, there's also the SHDN# signal wired to >>>>>>> GPIO, which should be high for normal operation. >>>>> >>>>>>> Signed-off-by: Sergei Shtylyov <sergei.shtylyov@cogentembedded.com> >>>>> >>>>>>> --- >>>>>>> The patch is against the 'extcon-next' branch of the 'extcon.git' repo. >>>>> >>>>>>> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/extcon/extcon-max3355.txt | 21 ++ >>>>>>> drivers/extcon/Kconfig | 6 >>>>>>> drivers/extcon/Makefile | 1 >>>>>>> drivers/extcon/extcon-max3355.c | 122 >>>>>>> ++++++++++++ >>>>>>> 4 files changed, 150 insertions(+) >>>>> >>>>>>> Index: extcon/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/extcon/extcon-max3355.txt >>>>>>> =================================================================== >>>>>>> --- /dev/null >>>>>>> +++ extcon/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/extcon/extcon-max3355.txt >>>>>>> @@ -0,0 +1,21 @@ >>>>>>> +MAX3355 USB OTG chip >>>>> >>>>>> Need manufactor information as following : >>>>>> -> Maxim MAX3355 >>>>> >>>>> Would be Maxim enough? Or perhaps I should use Maxim Integrated [Products]? >>>> >>>> You haven't replied to my questions. >>>> >>>>>>> +-------------------- >>>>>>> + >>>>>>> +MAX3355 integrates a charge pump and comparators to enable a system with an >>>>>>> +integrated USB OTG dual-role transceiver to function as a USB OTG dual-role >>>>>>> +device. >>>>>>> + >>>>>>> +Required properties: >>>>>>> +- compatible: should be "maxim,max3355"; >>>>>>> +- maxim,shdn-gpio: should contain a phandle and GPIO specifier for the >>>>>>> GPIO pin >>>>>>> + connected to the MAX3355's SHDN# pin; >>>>>>> +- maxim,id-gpio: should contain a phandle and GPIO specifier for the GPIO pin >>>>>>> + connected to the MAX3355's ID_OUT pin. >>>>>>> + >>>>>>> +Example (Koelsch board): >>>>>>> + >>>>>>> + usb-otg { >>>>>>> + compatible = "maxim,max3355"; >>>>>>> + maxim,shdn-gpio = <&gpio2 4 GPIO_ACTIVE_LOW>; >>>>>>> + maxim,id-gpio = <&gpio5 31 GPIO_ACTIVE_HIGH>; >>>>> >>>>>> Kernel already supported the gpio helper function to get gpio from devicetree. >>>>>> I prefer use follwoing style by using of_get_gpio()/of_get_gpio_flags() in >>>>>> include/linux/of_gpio.h. >>>>> >>>>>> gpios = <&gpio2 4 GPIO_ACTIVE_LOW>, <&gpio5 31 GPIO_ACTIVE_HIGH>; >>>>> >>>>> OK, though Documentation/devicetree/bindings/gpio/gpio.txt does not seem >>>>> to insist on using this one... >>>> >>>> Moreover, it now says "gpios" isn't allowed for the new bindings. So I have to strongly disagree here... >>> >>> OK. But, I recommend you use the 'gpiod' with devm_gpiod_get >>> instead of using devm_gpio_request_one() directly as following: >>> You can refer drivers/extcon/extcon-usb-gpio.c about using gpiod. >>> >>> For example, >>> data->shdn_gpiod = devm_gpiod_get(dev, "maxim,shdn", GPIOD_IN); >>> data->id_gpiod = devm_gpiod_get(dev, "maxim,id", GPIOD_IN); >> >> Thanks, done now. I just had another idea: how about I add an optional "enable-gpio" property to the 'extcon-usb-gpio' driver? I wouldn't need my own driver then at all... :-) > > What is meaning of 'enable-gpio' property? > You better to explain your goal about 'enable-gpio' property
This optional property would serve for enabling the valid signal on the ID GPIO, the same way I'm using the SHDN# GPIO in the MAX3355 driver.
> Also, If you think that it is generic way about > adding 'enable-gpio' property to extcon-usb-gpio.c, > you can try it.
Yes, I think it would be generic enough.
> Thanks, > Chanwoo Choi
MBR, Sergei
| |