Messages in this thread | | | Date | Thu, 8 Oct 2015 17:07:41 +0200 | From | Andrew Lunn <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH net-next 4/6] net: dsa: add port_fdb_prepare |
| |
> > Hi Vivien > > > > Bike shedding a bit, but i would call this > > mv88e6xxx_port_fdb_prepare_add. > > I think port_fdb_prepare is fine because it is the only step that > actually needs the 2-phase model. del and dump are safe and don't need > pre-check.
O.K. I don't have a strong opinion, i just think sometime later we might run into a naming consistency issue. If this does happen, we can fix it then.
Andrew
| |