lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2015]   [Oct]   [8]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: CFS scheduler unfairly prefers pinned tasks
Dear Mike,

> I see a fairness issue ... but one opposite to your complaint.

Why is that opposite? I think it would be fair for the one pert process
to get 100% CPU, the many oink processes can get everything else. That
one oink is lowly 10% (when others are 100%) is of no consequence.

What happens when you un-pin pert: does it get 100%? What if you run two
perts? Have you reproduced my observations?

---

Good to see that you agree on the fairness issue... it MUST be fixed!
CFS might be wrong or wasteful, but never unfair.

Cheers, Paul

Paul Szabo psz@maths.usyd.edu.au http://www.maths.usyd.edu.au/u/psz/
School of Mathematics and Statistics University of Sydney Australia


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2015-10-08 13:21    [W:0.126 / U:1.300 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site