lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2015]   [Oct]   [12]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    Date
    From
    SubjectRe: [PATCH v13 00/23] Compile-time stack metadata validation

    * Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com> wrote:

    > Hi Ingo,
    >
    > Do you have any more objections to these patches? Would you be willing
    > to apply them?

    So I still don't like the tool namespace you picked: Git-alike generic naming plus
    subcommands work so much better that I'm not sure why we are even having that
    discussion: if you name your tool 'stacktool' and alias everything you have today
    to under 'stacktool run ...' and add 'stacktool help' as a second, obvious
    subcommand then you'll have your current syntax and a lot more future flexibility
    and ability to branch off various functionality a'la Git, perf or kvmtool ...

    It's an 100% equivalent superset of your current stacktool's parameter structure,
    so none of your prior objections apply.

    Thanks,

    Ingo


    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2015-10-12 10:01    [W:4.190 / U:0.720 seconds]
    ©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site