Messages in this thread | | | Date | Mon, 12 Oct 2015 09:41:11 +0200 | From | Ingo Molnar <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH v13 00/23] Compile-time stack metadata validation |
| |
* Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com> wrote:
> Hi Ingo, > > Do you have any more objections to these patches? Would you be willing > to apply them?
So I still don't like the tool namespace you picked: Git-alike generic naming plus subcommands work so much better that I'm not sure why we are even having that discussion: if you name your tool 'stacktool' and alias everything you have today to under 'stacktool run ...' and add 'stacktool help' as a second, obvious subcommand then you'll have your current syntax and a lot more future flexibility and ability to branch off various functionality a'la Git, perf or kvmtool ...
It's an 100% equivalent superset of your current stacktool's parameter structure, so none of your prior objections apply.
Thanks,
Ingo
| |